🔗 Share this article

A prominent western historian, a respected expert of the Wild West, has authored a new publication titled Gunfighters United, which examines the careers of the famed lawman and Doc Holliday. Gardner states annoyance with the oft-quoted phrase from a iconic cowboy film: “When the tale becomes reality, print the tale.”

“All writer uses it, they just beat it to death,” he says lightheartedly. “And it’s actually not correct. I wrote a account. I hope people to be engaged in the period, but I just get so exhausted of that quote. The myth is folklore. It never become truth. People can retell the legend but it won't make it truth.”

That Infamous Shootout at the Corral

In Tombstone, Arizona, on a day in October 1881, Earp and Doc Holliday were involved in a shootout that came to be known as the Tombstone gunfight. With Earp’s brothers, the pair confronted the rustlers, members wanted for crime and stealing. In a brief moment, three gang members were slain and Doc was hurt, as were the Earp brothers.

Even though being one of many western conflicts between authorities and criminals, it entered myth, largely thanks to iconic films including the John Ford film and Gunfight at the OK Corral.

Confusion and Disagreement in Historical Accounts

“A great deal of what we understand about it is provable,” he said of the real battle and its consequences. “But I consistently go back to one of the best statements, and it’s a very straightforward statement. A dressmaker, who observed the fight, said: ‘I don’t know. All was confusion.’”

Including the witnesses there had conflicting stories. Statements from the investigation is likewise unclear. Bystanders who were allies of the outlaws were lying, and every account is somewhat distinct. It’s rare when anyone aligns on any detail.

“All was confusion.” – a observer

“Including the people present were uncertain,” Gardner states. “So it’s really challenging to determine it, and it took place in 30 seconds.”

Storytelling and Hollywood Portrayals

He lived into the Hollywood age, passing away in 1929 at the years of eight decades. First shown on a silent movie screen in 1923, he subsequently became the subject of significant mid-century movies. In relatively recent years, he has been portrayed by a star in a modern western and a leading man in Wyatt Earp.

The historian drills through such legend-building to uncover the individuals below. His books span the range of the old west, from Billy the Kid and Pat Garrett to a civil war guerrilla.

Multifaceted Lives of Earp and Doc Holliday

Originating in Monmouth, Illinois in the mid-19th century, Wyatt was not old enough to fight in the the war, though he tried to do so. When he was two decades old, he was appointed a law officer in Missouri. Mistakes were done. Earp faced a calamity with the death of his spouse, Urilla, from illness in 1870. Subsequently, as a official, he retained revenue he obtained.

“We don't know why he kept it,” Gardner says. “He runs, and arrives in Indian Territory. He’s apprehended for swiping a animal, and then he’s in his home, and he’s operating a establishment. Eventually he travels back out West, and he settles in Kansas.”

Despite his troubled history, Wyatt shone as a police officer. Newspapers praised him frequently. In one example, he arrested a intoxicated man who had $500 on him. He secured the cash for the man and gave it back when he released him from jail.

Divergent Characters of the Pair

He points out the clear distinction between the duo. Wyatt was driven, aiming to advance himself and attain roles like sheriff. Holliday, originating in Georgia in 1851, was a dentist turned gambler. Unlike Earp, he did not show evidence of becoming stable.

“He just moves from one gambling place to the next one,” he says. “He doesn't truly evolve. And a portion of that’s his addiction to gambling. Part of that is consumption, coping with that and treating himself, whether it’s with whiskey or later opium.”

Legacy and Historical Relevance

This volume shows a fascinating element of the frontier: the tension between law and lawlessness, and the endeavors of authorities to impose order over emerging societies. The extent of bureaucracy that came after a gunfight – proceedings, statements, directives for compensation – might astonish those acquainted with simplified portrayals of the period.

Moreover, Earp and Doc were embroiled in partisan factional conflicts. He was a member of the GOP, while Tombstone lawman his rival was a Democrat, creating a rivalry for control and authority.

Finally, Gardner declines to idealize these individuals. Earp and Doc spent time on either side