🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.